Broken Supplier Relationship – Expert Witness Support

Our specialists have experience of giving evidence in the High Courts. You will not be faced with someone who can write a report, but crumbles under cross examination.​

Our expert witness specialists provide opinions on evidence in a clear, focused and logical manner. You will not have ‘techno-babble’ that Courts have difficulty interpreting. ​

We fully understand our duties to the Court in acting as an expert witness, as opposed to acting as an expert advisor. We also understand our obligations in respect of CPR Part 35.​

Our expert witness reports fully comply with appropriate standards, including those of formatting and focusing only on those specific areas inside our deep domain expertise.​

Our deep domain expertise and experience of narrowing issues with other expert witness individuals, often means that our clear evidence can quickly achieve agreement.​

Many expert witnesses only undertake ‘expert witness’ work. This often means their operational experience quickly dates. Our experts deal with live projects daily, thus keeping their skills current.​

Our experts are ‘thought leaders’ and publish good practice for the optimisation of complex relationships and service delivery. Some also undertake public speaking assignments.​

We’ll always be impartial and objective. At the same time, being mindful to be empathetic to your client and the emotions they are experiencing during the dispute/litigation process.​

Whilst maintaining our independence and objectivity, we will be considerate to the differing opinions between legal representatives, experts and clients.​

We’ve all had experience of experts with huge egos. You won’t find that with us. Again, whilst remaining independent, we take on board views from all sides that provide better evidence context. ​

Being independent means our evidence appraisal will include an honest, but considerate opinion of both the strengths and challenges in evidence you face.​

We’ll always provide you with the deepest technical domain skills. We won’t ‘blag’ it – we know you have too much riding on your case. If we can’t do it, we’ll recommend others. ​

Mr Richard Mawrey QC, Barrister/Deputy High Court Judge, Henderson Chambers

“I have a high opinion of their abilities. Their high level of expertise is always expressed in a clear, focused and logical manner. I have recommended them as experts in appropriate cases with complete confidence.”

Mr Martin Hicks QC, Senior Barrister, The chambers of David Waters QC

“The technical investigation conducted by Best Practice Group was thorough and the presentation of their report was both objective and pertinent. I continue to have a high opinion of their abilities.”

Mr Robert Onslow, Barrister, Chambers of Mark Platt-Mills QC

“I have recommended Best Practice Group to a number of clients in heavy IT litigation because their expert reports are balanced, lucid and above all, jargon-free.”

Mr Matthew Lawson, Barrister, The Chambers of Richard Ferguson QC

“I would recommend Best Practice Group. Their written and oral presentation of evidence was clear, logical and persuasive.”

Mr Michael Green, Partner, Weightmans

“From the initial instruction Best Practice Group provided robust, coherent  and purposeful advice which paid particularly close attention to the instructions, a trait not always forthcoming in experts. I have no doubt their intervention was pivotal in making the other side face up to reality and eventually led to settlement. I would recommend them without hesitation.”

Mr Tim Ashdown, Head of IP/IT at DMH Solicitors

“We regularly instruct Best Practice Group, and its wealth of retained expertise, to assist our clients in resolving technology issues. They are skilled in procurement and implementation but also in providing consultancy and expert advice when disputes arise. The skills of BPG and its consultants have enabled us to resolve a number of extremely complex and high-value technology disputes at a much earlier stage and on much better terms than would have been achieved without them.”